Hwulivn wrote:So true. This really has the potential to be the most interesting urban area of the whole metro.
Dialexa - a fast-growing tech product design and R&D firm that got its start on the east side of downtown - is renting a row of three buildings in the new East Quarter project on Commerce Street.
Dialexa cofounder Scott Harper said the company will more than double its offices with the new East Quarter lease.
"We've been down in that area for maybe five years prior to the current project," Harper said. "We love the area.
"We looked around to see what else was out there and at different areas of town," he said. "This ended up being the best fit for us - we didn't feel the same about anywhere else."
Harper said he hopes to move into the new office in the second quarter of next year.
mdg109 wrote:I like how they're extending the enclosed bottom portion of the triangular building for more retail/restaurant space. Also, I didn't realize they're wanting to close the street next to it for pedestrians.
muncien wrote:mdg109 wrote:I like how they're extending the enclosed bottom portion of the triangular building for more retail/restaurant space. Also, I didn't realize they're wanting to close the street next to it for pedestrians.
No kidding! That is great news (if approved). If we could convert several more of these streets like this, you could end up with quite an inviting downtown for pedestrians.
lakewoodhobo wrote:My favorite thing to come out of the East Quarter development so far. This is what the Masonic Temple would look like if you traveled back in time.
IMG_6369.jpg
"Now the Dallas-based developer is filling a vacant block between the historic buildings it's renovating with a new high-rise retail, office and apartment project.
The 17-story tower is planned at the intersection of Jackson Street and Cesar Chavez Boulevard near Deep Ellum and the Farmers Market."
eburress wrote:Wow, that's pretty freaking awesome! I hope this happens and isn't just marketing propaganda!
ArtVandelay wrote:Tell that to the low rise homeowners in the farmers market that will no longer have a view of downtown.
quixomniac wrote:eburress wrote:Wow, that's pretty freaking awesome! I hope this happens and isn't just marketing propaganda!
Forgot to add a few things.
Looks like "Work is scheduled to begin on the tower later this year, with the project to open starting in 2021."
Also:
Todd Interests' Stephanie Herold said there will be 336 apartments in the upper levels of the building, with an eighth-floor deck with swimming pool and outdoor areas for the tenants.
1557419483-IMG_0025.jpg1557419558-IMG_0024.jpg
ArtVandelay wrote:Tell that to the low rise homeowners in the farmers market that will no longer have a view of downtown.
eburress wrote:ArtVandelay wrote:Tell that to the low rise homeowners in the farmers market that will no longer have a view of downtown.
I'll never understand people living in Downtown complaining about losing their views of Downtown. If that's not an example of not being able to see the forest for the trees, I don't know what is.
ContriveDallasite wrote:ArtVandelay wrote:Tell that to the low rise homeowners in the farmers market that will no longer have a view of downtown.
The NIMBYism in this city is incredible
ArtVandelay wrote:eburress wrote:ArtVandelay wrote:Tell that to the low rise homeowners in the farmers market that will no longer have a view of downtown.
I'll never understand people living in Downtown complaining about losing their views of Downtown. If that's not an example of not being able to see the forest for the trees, I don't know what is.
Yeah you wouldn’t understand unless a) you purchase your home for the view (a major selling point of the neighborhood) and b) a 17 story building was built abutting your property casting a shadow over it.
The character of that neighborhood and the Harwood Historic District is mid rise not high rise. So yes, there was an expectation there wouldn’t be high rises in that section of downtown.
eburress wrote:ArtVandelay wrote:eburress wrote:
I'll never understand people living in Downtown complaining about losing their views of Downtown. If that's not an example of not being able to see the forest for the trees, I don't know what is.
Yeah you wouldn’t understand unless a) you purchase your home for the view (a major selling point of the neighborhood) and b) a 17 story building was built abutting your property casting a shadow over it.
The character of that neighborhood and the Harwood Historic District is mid rise not high rise. So yes, there was an expectation there wouldn’t be high rises in that section of downtown.
More like an assumption, and a pretty poor one at that.
ArtVandelay wrote:eburress wrote:ArtVandelay wrote:Tell that to the low rise homeowners in the farmers market that will no longer have a view of downtown.
I'll never understand people living in Downtown complaining about losing their views of Downtown. If that's not an example of not being able to see the forest for the trees, I don't know what is.
Yeah you wouldn’t understand unless a) you purchase your home for the view (a major selling point of the neighborhood) and b) a 17 story building was built abutting your property casting a shadow over it.
The character of that neighborhood and the Harwood Historic District is mid rise not high rise. So yes, there was an expectation there wouldn’t be high rises in that section of downtown.
ArtVandelay wrote:eburress wrote:ArtVandelay wrote:
Yeah you wouldn’t understand unless a) you purchase your home for the view (a major selling point of the neighborhood) and b) a 17 story building was built abutting your property casting a shadow over it.
The character of that neighborhood and the Harwood Historic District is mid rise not high rise. So yes, there was an expectation there wouldn’t be high rises in that section of downtown.
More like an assumption, and a pretty poor one at that.
Haha Eburress. How sanctimonious of you.
Tnexster wrote:ArtVandelay wrote:eburress wrote:
I'll never understand people living in Downtown complaining about losing their views of Downtown. If that's not an example of not being able to see the forest for the trees, I don't know what is.
Yeah you wouldn’t understand unless a) you purchase your home for the view (a major selling point of the neighborhood) and b) a 17 story building was built abutting your property casting a shadow over it.
The character of that neighborhood and the Harwood Historic District is mid rise not high rise. So yes, there was an expectation there wouldn’t be high rises in that section of downtown.
Reminds me of people living in 1999 McKinney surrounded by all of the land that eventually got developed and then people living there seemed surprised.
ArtVandelay wrote:The character of that neighborhood and the Harwood Historic District is mid rise not high rise. So yes, there was an expectation there wouldn’t be high rises in that section of downtown.
Users browsing this forum: MC_ScattCat, Pinhi and 51 guests