
cowboyeagle05 wrote:What is unfortunate is the smaller building at the corner there labeled 2200 Main in this screenshot will be torn down for parking. I am not sad for the historical quality of the building but because the corner will become another lot.
Screen Shot 2018-05-23 at 1.05.15 PM.png
National Anthem is a restaurant going into the vintage triangular Magnolia Oil building in downtown Dallas from favorite chef Nick Badovinus. Fall 2018.
PMA is a drop-in spot serving coffee, doughnuts, and to-go items, going into the vintage triangular Magnolia Oil building in downtown Dallas from favorite chef Nick Badovinus. Fall 2018.
All the plan needs is some non-millionaire housing that’s affordable to folks who work nearby that adds the vibrancy downtown Dallas really needs.
tamtagon wrote:
I agree with Jon Anderson of Candy's Dirt - The East Quarter needs people, and given the prime location between Farmers Market, Deep Ellum and the rest of the CBD, it should be developed as the most densely populated pocket in the CBD
Digital firm OrderMyGear has rented 23,000 square feet of offices in the new East Quarter redevelopment along Commerce Street at Cesar Chavez.
The building where the company is expanding at 2211 Commerce Street was a Cadillac auto dealership back in the 1920s and 1930s.
trueicon wrote: I imagine the developer will flex his muscle because obviously a teardown would increase property values and the overall viability of this project.
lakewoodhobo wrote:I wonder if Jackson St could be narrowed or even closed here to give the district a pedestrian-oriented focal point. Build something with balconies on the other side, similar in scale to the French quarter, and connect it all with festival lights to give it some personality so walking is less of a game of Frogger. It would just be a block, but it would set the standard for what the future of this area could look like.
Screen Shot 2018-09-11 at 11.55.32 AM.jpg
I'm optimistic about the East Quarter in general, but it needs much bigger ideas than just fixing and rebranding commercial space if it's going to thrive.
lakewoodhobo wrote:I wonder if Jackson St could be narrowed or even closed here to give the district a pedestrian-oriented focal point. Build something with balconies on the other side, similar in scale to the French quarter, and connect it all with festival lights to give it some personality so walking is less of a game of Frogger. It would just be a block, but it would set the standard for what the future of this area could look like.
Screen Shot 2018-09-11 at 11.55.32 AM.jpg
I'm optimistic about the East Quarter in general, but it needs much bigger ideas than just fixing and rebranding commercial space if it's going to thrive.
exelone31 wrote:I think that's a great idea. Something additional to consider is that this image will is a block west of where the new park is supposed to go as well (Jackson Park? that may be wrong). Hopefully that park will also bring a bit of a pedestrian vibe.
eburress wrote:It is a tragedy that it was allowed to happen. If anyone's seen those 70s era aerial photos of Houston, the destruction was even worse.
Mr. Amsterdam wrote:Wow. I cannot believe anyone would let parking consume a city like that, even during the height of carphoria.
They look at Frisco with salivation and want that here.
The_Overdog wrote:They look at Frisco with salivation and want that here.
This is all on Dallas. Nothing in Frisco has been built with a giant surface lot until you get to nearly Prosper. The most anti-urban thing Frisco has done recently is slightly widen their main street. And the downzoning of US75 to drive-thus adjacent to a DART station is all on Dallas too. You don't want to see what the suburbs are planning along 75. It'll break your heart to compare the two.
tamtagon wrote:...the giant surface lots are simply stacked up this go'round. Garages.
The_Overdog wrote:They look at Frisco with salivation and want that here.
This is all on Dallas. Nothing in Frisco has been built with a giant surface lot until you get to nearly Prosper. The most anti-urban thing Frisco has done recently is slightly widen their main street. And the downzoning of US75 to drive-thus adjacent to a DART station is all on Dallas too. You don't want to see what the suburbs are planning along 75. It'll break your heart to compare the two.
Tnexster wrote:The_Overdog wrote:They look at Frisco with salivation and want that here.
This is all on Dallas. Nothing in Frisco has been built with a giant surface lot until you get to nearly Prosper. The most anti-urban thing Frisco has done recently is slightly widen their main street. And the downzoning of US75 to drive-thus adjacent to a DART station is all on Dallas too. You don't want to see what the suburbs are planning along 75. It'll break your heart to compare the two.
Isn't Stonebriar in Frisco? And the last time I was was there I saw a giant surface parking lot. Same with the retail strip mall that sits to the north of Stonebriar and all of the restaurants along Preston. Hall Office Park is full of surface lots and the Star has surface parking. Not sure I get where "nothing" comes from.
DAFW wrote:Tnexster wrote:The_Overdog wrote:
This is all on Dallas. Nothing in Frisco has been built with a giant surface lot until you get to nearly Prosper. The most anti-urban thing Frisco has done recently is slightly widen their main street. And the downzoning of US75 to drive-thus adjacent to a DART station is all on Dallas too. You don't want to see what the suburbs are planning along 75. It'll break your heart to compare the two.
Isn't Stonebriar in Frisco? And the last time I was was there I saw a giant surface parking lot. Same with the retail strip mall that sits to the north of Stonebriar and all of the restaurants along Preston. Hall Office Park is full of surface lots and the Star has surface parking. Not sure I get where "nothing" comes from.
I believe he was talking about major recent suburban developments, and he's still technically correct. The Star when it's fully built out will have no large surface parking. Whatever surface lots are there now already have plans to be replaced by giant office buildings and apartment towers. Legacy West has no large surface parking, Frisco station will have no large surface parking, and neither will the gate. In Hall Park, almost every existing large surface parking lot will be re-purposed for future High-rises as stated in their updated master plan. The only recent projects I've seen that are being built with large surface parking lots is Frisco North which is touching the Frisco/prosper border.
DAFW wrote:I believe he was talking about major recent suburban developments, and he's still technically correct. The Star when it's fully built out will have no large surface parking. Whatever surface lots are there now already have plans to be replaced by giant office buildings and apartment towers. Legacy West has no large surface parking, Frisco station will have no large surface parking, and neither will the gate. In Hall Park, almost every existing large surface parking lot will be re-purposed for future High-rises as stated in their updated master plan. The only recent projects I've seen that are being built with large surface parking lots is Frisco North which is touching the Frisco/prosper border.
The_Overdog wrote:They look at Frisco with salivation and want that here.
This is all on Dallas. Nothing in Frisco has been built with a giant surface lot until you get to nearly Prosper. The most anti-urban thing Frisco has done recently is slightly widen their main street. And the downzoning of US75 to drive-thus adjacent to a DART station is all on Dallas too. You don't want to see what the suburbs are planning along 75. It'll break your heart to compare the two.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests