Tnexster wrote:So we have this on the south side of downtown and De La Vega and that massive development on the north side. Can Dallas absorb that much new space? Especially now?
rono3849 wrote:As much as I'd like to see this work, I just don't think it's possible. It's basically disconnected from the rest of the Downtown area & the South side of Downtown has no draw to want to be there. City Hall can't pull in folks & of what I've seen of AT&T's District, that won't do it either. All of those hideous open parking lots will remain empty for years to come, IMO.
Tucy wrote:Tnexster wrote:So we have this on the south side of downtown and De La Vega and that massive development on the north side. Can Dallas absorb that much new space? Especially now?
Here's some food for thought on that topic:
According to Transwestern's office market reports, at the end of 2017, 25,798,000 square feet of office space was occupied in the CBD and another 11,854,000 square feet was occupied in Uptown, for a greater downtown occupied space total of 37,652,000 square feet.
Now, in mid-2020, the CBD has only 23,400,000 square feet occupied and Uptown has 12,812,000 square feet occupied, for a greater downtown occupied space total of 36,214,000; Almost 1.5 Million less office space is occupied than 2 1/2 years ago.
THRILLHO wrote:This project as a whole feels like something that hinges a lot on presumed area growth set into motion by the high speed rail station and the proposed deck park. In the meantime, I can see just one of these buildings getting built while the rest wait for a reason to exist.
Cbdallas wrote:Would love to see this part of Downtown activated.
rono3849 wrote:Newpark.Tower.jpg
This is the rendering of Newpark Tower #1 that has been discussed. Dallas Morning News says the tower will start in early 2021. I guess I was wrong about this development's future. The South side of Downtown, coupled with the East Quarter 24 Building, could see a real boost in the coming decade for this long ignored area.
willyk wrote:Given that there are 0 sq ft of office space currently under lease in this neighborhood, might it make more sense to prove up the market with a few nicely done 5-8 story buildings, THEN go tall?
Just asking.
maconahey wrote:Obviously anything is better than nothing, but this reminds me way too much of the W Hotel in Victory Park...
Ace wrote:Cbdallas wrote:Would love to see this part of Downtown activated.
Never happen. Downtown is located too far away from the bubble that includes the Park Cities, Knox Park, Turtle Creek, and Uptown. Too risky! Downtown has been a shrinking office market for over thirtyfive years. Dallas has an incredible amount of upscale! I don't see future investment in Knox spreading to Henderson. And there is not near enough cheering going on in and around this neighborhood. CAMPAIGNING by way of breaking windows, looting, turning over cars, and shooting people has thrown central Dallas, perception wise, way way back in those black and white video days. Same old social agenda arguing for centralized control implemented from the District of Columbia. Like putting out California fires on national lands from thousands of miles away in Washington.
maconahey wrote:Obviously anything is better than nothing, but this reminds me way too much of the W Hotel in Victory Park...
Mr. Amsterdam wrote:
The lack of creativity in Dallas mid-high rise design is a consistent disappoint. Nearly everything that pops up in the Netherlands makes me ask, "Why can't Dallas do that?"
vman wrote:Mr. Amsterdam wrote:
The lack of creativity in Dallas mid-high rise design is a consistent disappoint. Nearly everything that pops up in the Netherlands makes me ask, "Why can't Dallas do that?"
I feel the same way. I don't believe a building has to be tall to be of good architectural or interesting design.
I don't understand what is going on in Dallas with all of these extremely lackluster new buildings.
But in comparison to a city like Amsterdam, American architecture has become pretty boring in general. They do such great things with smaller buildings there.
Mr. Amsterdam wrote:vman wrote:Mr. Amsterdam wrote:
The lack of creativity in Dallas mid-high rise design is a consistent disappoint. Nearly everything that pops up in the Netherlands makes me ask, "Why can't Dallas do that?"
I feel the same way. I don't believe a building has to be tall to be of good architectural or interesting design.
I don't understand what is going on in Dallas with all of these extremely lackluster new buildings.
But in comparison to a city like Amsterdam, American architecture has become pretty boring in general. They do such great things with smaller buildings there.
Not necessarily. I was in Seattle in 2015 and was shocked at the designs of the new buildings. Dallas is in a league of its own when it comes to bland. It's like the Chili's of cities.
Mr. Amsterdam wrote: at the designs of the new buildings. Dallas is in a league of its own when it comes to bland. It's like the Chili's of cities.
Mr. Amsterdam wrote:Ace wrote:Cbdallas wrote:Would love to see this part of Downtown activated.
Never happen. Downtown is located too far away from the bubble that includes the Park Cities, Knox Park, Turtle Creek, and Uptown. Too risky! Downtown has been a shrinking office market for over thirtyfive years. Dallas has an incredible amount of upscale! I don't see future investment in Knox spreading to Henderson. And there is not near enough cheering going on in and around this neighborhood. CAMPAIGNING by way of breaking windows, looting, turning over cars, and shooting people has thrown central Dallas, perception wise, way way back in those black and white video days. Same old social agenda arguing for centralized control implemented from the District of Columbia. Like putting out California fires on national lands from thousands of miles away in Washington.
God, you're insufferable. I can't tell if this guy is a bot or a troll.maconahey wrote:Obviously anything is better than nothing, but this reminds me way too much of the W Hotel in Victory Park...
Agreed. I like the W, but the city doesn't need a second. The lack of creativity in Dallas mid-high rise design is a consistent disappoint. Nearly everything that pops up in the Netherlands makes me ask, "Why can't Dallas do that?"
Code: Select all
Reported: 10/27/2020
Project Title
Track Project
Newpark Mixed-Use Development
Project Type New Construction
Physical Address Canton Street Map
City, State (County) Dallas, TX 75201 (Dallas County)
Category(s) Commercial, Residential
Sub-Category(s) Apartments/Condominiums, Hotel/Motel, Office, Retail
Contracting Method General Contractor to Subcontract.
Project Status Construction Documents, Construction Start Expected first quarter 2021
Estimated Value Greater than $10,000,000 CJ's Estimate
Owner
Hoque Global Website Analysis
1717 Main Street
Dallas, TX 75201 (214) 461-1681
Architect
Merriman Anderson Architects Website Analysis
300 North Field Street
Dallas, TX 75202 (214) 987-1299
fax: (214) 987-2138
General Contractor
Moss Construction Website Analysis
6950 TPC Drive - Suite 300
McKinney, TX 75070 (855) 360-6677
Details Retail, New Construction, Office, 225,000 SF New Construction, Apartments/Condominiums, New Construction, 268 Unit(s), Hotel/Motel, New Construction, 245 Unit(s), 38 Stories Above Grade, New Construction.
tamtagon wrote:The potential of the location is finally paying off. ATT's destination is an easy walk, too. The convention center is finally getting the adjacent destinations it needs, becoming more competitive. And the HSR station, also walking distance.... watch this side of town surge for a generation.
I thought about that too.. but I hope they choose Smart District.jetnd87 wrote:Or the Link at Uptown. I'd be surprised if they moved to the burbs given their and their competitors' current locations here. But who knows
Users browsing this forum: tamtagon and 17 guests