L.A.'s new tallest building is poised to become a lightsaber with massive LED displays
L.A.'s new tallest building is poised to become a lightsaber with massive LED displays
By Benjamin Oreskes, Los Angeles Times, June 24, 2017, 10:45AM
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-wilshire-grand-lights-20170624-htmlstory.html
LA's new tallest, The Wilshire Grand
Re: LA's new tallest, The Wilshire Grand
That's really a nice looking tower.
Re: LA's new tallest, The Wilshire Grand
Are they counting that antenna in the building height?
If so, is it REALLY LA's tallest?
Yeah, the "spire" is 294 feet tall. So, this is a nice looking tower, but it's NOT the tallest building in Los Angeles.
source: SkyscraperPage.com
If so, is it REALLY LA's tallest?
Yeah, the "spire" is 294 feet tall. So, this is a nice looking tower, but it's NOT the tallest building in Los Angeles.
source: SkyscraperPage.com
Last edited by texasstar on 29 Jun 2017 10:36, edited 2 times in total.
Re: LA's new tallest, The Wilshire Grand
I got tired of the sneaky, "well technically it reaches a higher architectural height" and "no, antennas aren't allowed to count as spires" garbage ten or fifteen years ago and built my own database that's like a topographic map, but for highrise architecture. You can choose a tower and see its size above a certain height level, or its total cubic footage (square feet per height) on the skyline, so that you're comparing apples to apples.
If someone handy wants to help me by programming an interface where I can sum all the buildings on a skyline, so that a chart can overlap exactly one city's height on another's, let me know!
If someone handy wants to help me by programming an interface where I can sum all the buildings on a skyline, so that a chart can overlap exactly one city's height on another's, let me know!
Re: LA's new tallest, The Wilshire Grand
Since no one's responded to my substantive posts lately, I'll throw in some trivia. Wilshire Grand's spire has a purpose, yet it was not really to beat LA's existing tallest, but to ward off The Bay's new tallest. The new one in SF specifically has a 100-foot tiara to make it "officially" 1,070 feet, and because of this 1,100-foot pinnacle the SF press have been reduced to quibbling about highest occupiable floors. They claim 970' beats Los Angeles' US Bank Tower at 968' (which is even more silly -- even if Houston didn't still beat both of them by that measure).
Re: LA's new tallest, The Wilshire Grand
The tower could easily stand on its own without that stupid needle on top to claim the tallest in LA or California or the west or whatever. That seems like a cheap way to make that claim.
Re: LA's new tallest, The Wilshire Grand
This coming year is likely to see a veritable Top Ten of new tallests arriving at their final heights:
1121' - Philadelphia - Comcast Technology Center
1099' - Los Angeles - Wilshire Grand Center
1070' - San Francisco - Salesforce Tower
918' - Monterrey - Torre KOI
900' - Jersey City - 99 Hudson St.
877' - Mexico City - Torre Mitikah
868' - Miami - Panorama Tower
823' - Edmonton - Stantec Tower
810' - Calgary - Brookfield Place East
690' - Austin - the Independent
1121' - Philadelphia - Comcast Technology Center
1099' - Los Angeles - Wilshire Grand Center
1070' - San Francisco - Salesforce Tower
918' - Monterrey - Torre KOI
900' - Jersey City - 99 Hudson St.
877' - Mexico City - Torre Mitikah
868' - Miami - Panorama Tower
823' - Edmonton - Stantec Tower
810' - Calgary - Brookfield Place East
690' - Austin - the Independent
Re: LA's new tallest, The Wilshire Grand
I cannot believe ATT is just going to sit back and watch Comcast break the 1100 threshold.
Re: LA's new tallest, The Wilshire Grand
Beautiful building.
-
- Posts: 3190
- Joined: 21 Oct 2016 08:45
- Location: Dallas
Re: LA's new tallest, The Wilshire Grand
tamtagon wrote:I cannot believe ATT is just going to sit back and watch Comcast break the 1100 threshold.
Probably cause it won't really guarantee they win in the profit department. Like a douchy guy who stuffs his pants the guy who actually has the equipment will lock up the girl long term. I am quite proud AT&T has not decided to leave their existing campus for a flashy tower in Uptown. Now if they wanna keep the company in their old campus and put the top execs in a flashy new tower that Hillwood builds near Klyde Warren I'm satisfied as well. Just don't completely vacate their existing campus which I doubt would lease out well once emptied by a company like AT&T.
“Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell”
Re: LA's new tallest, The Wilshire Grand
I45Tex wrote:This coming year is likely to see a veritable Top Ten of new tallests arriving at their final heights:
1121' - Philadelphia - Comcast Technology Center
1099' - Los Angeles - Wilshire Grand Center
1070' - San Francisco - Salesforce Tower
918' - Monterrey - Torre KOI
900' - Jersey City - 99 Hudson St.
877' - Mexico City - Torre Mitikah
868' - Miami - Panorama Tower
823' - Edmonton - Stantec Tower
810' - Calgary - Brookfield Place East
690' - Austin - the Independent
If we use texasstar’s idea that spires don’t really count, Nashville’s new second-tallest would be on this list as their tallest, too. Meanwhile a new 800’ tallest for Michigan has now broken ground in Detroit, and plans are filed for this one in Oakland, CA: http://hoodline.com/2017/10/plans-unvei ... -structure
I don’t think a timeline is set for denial or approval of 600 Guadalupe, the larger new proposal in Austin.