L.A.'s new tallest building is poised to become a lightsaber with massive LED displays
By Benjamin Oreskes, Los Angeles Times, June 24, 2017, 10:45AM
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-m ... story.html
Probably cause it won't really guarantee they win in the profit department. Like a douchy guy who stuffs his pants the guy who actually has the equipment will lock up the girl long term. I am quite proud AT&T has not decided to leave their existing campus for a flashy tower in Uptown. Now if they wanna keep the company in their old campus and put the top execs in a flashy new tower that Hillwood builds near Klyde Warren I'm satisfied as well. Just don't completely vacate their existing campus which I doubt would lease out well once emptied by a company like AT&T.tamtagon wrote:I cannot believe ATT is just going to sit back and watch Comcast break the 1100 threshold.
If we use texasstar’s idea that spires don’t really count, Nashville’s new second-tallest would be on this list as their tallest, too. Meanwhile a new 800’ tallest for Michigan has now broken ground in Detroit, and plans are filed for this one in Oakland, CA: http://hoodline.com/2017/10/plans-unvei ... -structureI45Tex wrote:This coming year is likely to see a veritable Top Ten of new tallests arriving at their final heights:
1121' - Philadelphia - Comcast Technology Center
1099' - Los Angeles - Wilshire Grand Center
1070' - San Francisco - Salesforce Tower
918' - Monterrey - Torre KOI
900' - Jersey City - 99 Hudson St.
877' - Mexico City - Torre Mitikah
868' - Miami - Panorama Tower
823' - Edmonton - Stantec Tower
810' - Calgary - Brookfield Place East
690' - Austin - the Independent