R1070 wrote:Tivo_Kenevil wrote:Look and Feel may change some... Let's hope it's for the better..
I'm getting "CVS" or "QT" vibes from that. lol
Watch them just add suburban strip malls LMAO
R1070 wrote:Tivo_Kenevil wrote:Look and Feel may change some... Let's hope it's for the better..
I'm getting "CVS" or "QT" vibes from that. lol
mdg109 wrote:So, if the detention centers/courts stay, then are we just stuck with bail bond, liquor stores, and cheap attorneys scattered around this section?
Tnexster wrote:Basically right up against I-30, interesting. Nice to see height pushing so close to Fair Park.
R1070 wrote:It would be smart for this building to go up after the park is done to get more profit out of it.
undefinedprocess wrote:Tivo_Kenevil wrote:3 towers in one project?! Am I dreaming?!
Dreaming of being in Austin? Knowing you, probably.
Tucy wrote:Average weekday DART ridership at the DFW station:
FY 2014: 922
FY 2015: 898
FY 2016: 968
FY 2017: 976
FY 2018: 929
FY 2019: 951
FY 2020: 768
FY 2021: 893
R1070 wrote:I think the 30-31 story residential tower next to this lot is supposed to kick off soon as well.
R1070 wrote:Yea, I've given up as well. It is what it is at this point. Dallas has a small area it could actually create a very vibrant urban experience unique to the rest of the Metroplex, but continues to allow designs found in Legacy - Plano.
rono3849 wrote:From what I hear, Urby II will be under construction by the end of Summer. This is what New York developers do. They don't sit around and contemplate the circumstances. They committed to build in Dallas and they are following through. Good for them.
tamtagon wrote:If they want to be in the nicest part of the city, it'll be downtown, if they want an affordable location in North Texas, it'll be in Collin County.
potatocoins wrote:Also waiting for one in the East Dallas area..
Tnexster wrote:^Is this not the entrance to the tollway? Do we want pedestrians on the tollway? Although I understand the importance of pedestrian connectivity I don't know that this particular incidence is necessarily wrong.